As Punjab reacts strongly, the Central Government clarifies that reforms to Chandigarh’s governance are still under discussion, not finalized.
Centre Clarifies on Chandigarh Plans
The Central Government has responded to mounting political heat by stating there is no final decision yet on proposed administrative changes in Chandigarh.
According to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), while a bill is being considered, it “in no way” aims to change Chandigarh’s current governance structure.
What’s Causing the Uproar?
At the heart of the controversy is the proposed 131st Constitutional Amendment Bill, which would bring Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Indian Constitution. Under Article 240, the President would have the power to make regulations for the Union Territory, potentially leading to a stronger central role.
Punjab’s political leaders have reacted sharply:
- AAP, Congress, and SAD accuse the Centre of undermining Punjab’s claim over its capital.
- CM Bhagwant Mann says the move threatens Punjab’s historic rights to Chandigarh.
- According to him, any attempt to appoint a separate administrator or reduce Punjab’s influence is a “betrayal of federal trust.”
Centre’s Position: Discussion, Not Imposition
The MHA stressed that the bill is still under consideration, not finalized. They reiterated that the proposal is more about streamlining law-making than altering control.
In short, the Centre is pushing back against the narrative that it plans to “take over” Chandigarh from Punjab — but many in Punjab remain unconvinced.
The Next Steps
- The Winter Session of Parliament, during which the 131st Amendment may be introduced, begins on December 1, 2025.
- Punjab leaders are preparing for a political fight; some have hinted at protests if their demands are not met.
- Observers say this row is not just about Chandigarh — it’s a flashpoint for broader Centre–State tensions and federal autonomy.
Related News : Sunil Jakhar Says “Punjab Comes First” in Chandigarh Row, Urges Talks With Centre
